Horizon Compliance
  • Home
  • About
  • Training
  • Store
  • Client Portal
  • Blog
  • Contact

Compliance 

and other interesting stuff

Financial Soundness for FAIS FSPs

9/28/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture
​Category 1 FSPs may no longer subtract subordinated loans from the current liabilities
​What are the financial soundness requirements?
The FAIS Act explains the Financial Soundness requirements for FSPs in Chapter 6 of the Fit and Proper Board Notice 194 of 2017. The FSP must meet the financial soundness requirements at all times.
There are different requirements for different types of FSPs, however the three main categories for most of the FSPs are as follows:
  1. General Solvency Requirement (Overall Outcome: Assets > Liabilities)
  2. Working Capital Requirement (Overall Outcome: Current Assets > Current Liabilities)
  3. Liquidity Requirement (Overall Outcome: Maintain Liquid Assets >= x/52 weeks of Annual Expenditure according to the FSP category)
 
What important changes took place regarding subordinated loans?
The most important change that we come face to face with almost monthly is the change where Category 1 FSPs may no longer subtract subordinated loans from the current liabilities in the working capital requirements. This requirement is applicable to Category 1 FSPs Holding Client Funds, and Category 1 FSPs Not Holding Client Funds.
 
How can an FSP ensure it meets the requirements?
The FAIS Act states that all FSPs should maintain monthly management accounts if these accounts are continuously monitored and compared with the financial soundness requirements the FSP should be able to maintain the financial soundness requirements.
 
What can an FSP do if they suspect that the requirements are not being met?
It is immensely important that the FSP follow one of these two steps as soon as the FSP suspects or foresees that the financial soundness requirements are not being, or will not be met, these are listed and explained as follows:
  1. Early Warning Report
  2. Rely on FSCA Exemption
 
  • The Early Warning Report is a report that can be submitted to the FSCA by the FSP or its Compliance Officers. The FSP must submit or request their Compliance Officer to submit an Early Warning Report that is certified by the CEO, controlling member, managing or general partner or trustee of the FSP, if one of the following financial statuses are true for the FSP:
  1. Assets exceed liabilities by less than 10%
  2. Current assets exceed current liabilities by less than 10%
  3. If any of the financial soundness requirements are not met or if the FSP becomes aware of any situation that may result in any of the above  

  • FSCA Exemption Application is an application that can be sent to the FSCA before the financial year end to assist the FSP with meeting the financial requirements as set out in the exemption application, this exemption does not mean that an FSP does not have to meet any of the requirements as set out in the Financial Soundness Requirements, but this exemption allows for some leeway between the Financial Soundness Requirements and the exemption requirements to assist the FSP to meet the requirements even if it is then by only meeting the requirements as set out by the exemption. There is additional documentation that must be sent together with this application within 7 days of relying on this exemption, these are as follows:
  1. Annexure 6 (Form A: Liquidity Calculation) of BN194 of 2017 to the FSCA (Liquidity Calculation certified by the CEO, controlling member, managing or general partner, or trustee of the FSP.
  2. An Action Plan showing how the FSP plans to re-establish its financial position to meet the financial soundness requirements and this plan should include the steps that the FSP will take and in what timeframe these steps will take place to ensure the financial soundness requirements that is not currently met, are met as soon as possible.

​In addition to the above, the FSP must submit the following items every 6 months from the date that
​        the FSP relied on the exemption:
  • Management accounts
  • Regularly updated Liquidity Calculation (Form A)
The exemption conditions are as follows:
Picture
​How to calculate an FSPs Financial Soundness Requirements?
The Financial Soundness requirements can be explained and calculated as follows:
Picture
​*Liquid Assets are calculated as follows:
  • Cash & cash equivalents +
  •  (Plus) Participatory interest in a Money Market Portfolio
  • (Plus) 70% of the market value of a participatory interest in a CIS, other than an investment in a money market portfolio or a CIS hedge fund
  • (Plus) 70% of the market value of a security listed on a licensed exchange provided it does not constitute more than 50% of total liquid assets
  • = Liquid Assets
​
*Annual Expenditure is calculated as follows:
  • Annual Expenditure
  • (less) staff bonuses
  • (less) employees’ and directors’, partners’ or members’ share in profit
  • (less) emoluments of directors, members, partners or sole proprietor
  • (less)  other appropriation of profits to directors, members and partners"
  • (less) remuneration that is linked to-
    • (aa)     a percentage of the FSP’s revenue; or
    • (bb)     a percentage of the revenue generated by an employee, representative or contractor of the FSP; and
    • that in the absence of such revenue the FSP has no obligation to pay the remuneration"
  • (less) depreciation
  • (less) bad debts
  • (less) any loss resulting from the sale of assets
 
Contact us for any information on the Compliance Officer services we provide for information on the financial soundness requirements, our team at Horizon Compliance are always keen to help.
1 Comment

FSCA sanctions on Momentum Wealth and Momentum Collective Investments

7/14/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
a reminder to accountable institutions to regularly submit CTRs, risk-rate clients (and potential clients) and comply with your own RMCP
This blog is about the recently imposed administrative sanctions on Momentum Wealth (Pty) Ltd and Momentum Collective Investments RF (Pty) Ltd by the FSCA.

The broad reason for the sanctions was the ineffective money laundering/terrorist financing control measures of both accountable institutions, as required by the FIC Act. The total financial penalty imposed by the regulator on these institutions amounted to R11,100,000.00 (excluding an amount of R100,000.00 which is suspended for three years).

The breaches identified by the FSCA were the following:
  1. Non-compliance with cash threshold reporting (CTR) requirements on historic transactions (2010-2017).
  2. Risk-rating failures:
  • Momentum Wealth failed to identify, verify and risk rate a beneficiary of one trust in terms of s 21B of the FIC Act.
  • Momentum CIS failed to risk rate 38 clients in line with their own RMCP.
 
These cases serve as a reminder to accountable institutions to regularly submit cash threshold reports, risk-rate clients(and potential clients) and comply with your own RMCP.

​For more information click here
0 Comments

Latest Sharemax Appeals Case

6/30/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
The investor’s risk is not entirely absorbed by the FSP.
In this blog we deal with the case of Ernest Lehanie ta Ernest Venter Makelaars and FAIS Ombud and Another where the Appeals Tribunal found against the FAIS Ombud. Because this deals with a Property Syndication investment this is also important for other cases of a similar nature. 
 
This matter relates to the appeal of a decision made by the FAIS Ombud. Briefly, the FSP breached the FAIS Act and Code of Conduct by not making a full disclosure regarding the high-risk investment product and all associated risks to the investor (who was a pensioner) for the investor to make an informed decision. Also, physical evidence of an analysis of the client’s financial needs and risk profiling seems is absent. Moreover, the prospectus given to the client contained contradictions relating to investor funds.
 
The FAIS Ombud’s decision:
The FSP breached its duty to act with skill, care and diligence by failing to ensure that the client invested in product that was right for his financial needs. This breach made the FSP liable to the client (investor). The FSP’s liability was based on its failure to provide a full disclosure to the investor and for not being able to reasonably foresee the investor’s loss.
 
The Financial Services Tribunal concluded as follows:
The lack of a full disclosure by the FSP about the investment was not sufficiently linked to the investor’s loss. That is, the FAIS Ombud erred in stating that the FSP should have reasonably foreseen the collapse of the Sharemax Property Syndication, thereby holding the FSP liable. The FSP’s failure to discharge its statutory duty, is not remotely linked to the investor’s loss. The investor’s risk is therefore, not entirely  the FSP's fault. Further evidence is required in order to establish a link if indeed there is any. This resulted in the entire application being disposed of. Therefore, the matter was referred back to the Ombud for further reconsideration.

For more information on this Financial Services Tribunal decision click here
0 Comments

What is PAIA?

6/21/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture
​The due date for PAIA and POPI is 1 July 2021
​PAIA is the acronym for the Promotion of Access to Information Act and it enables people to gain access to information held by public and private bodies so they may exercise any rights they have in relation to the information. It was historically only applied to government organisations and the legislation was expanded to apply to more businesses.

The PAIA manual does not have to be submitted to any regulator or person at this stage, it is, however, very important that the PAIA manual reflects on your company's website should PAIA apply to your company. There are thresholds' in place to indicate which companies are subject to a PAIA compliance and the rest of the companies that fall beneath these threshold amounts are exempt from having to comply with PAIA.

The PAIA thresholds are as follows, and should your company have this amount of employees of annual turnover per specific sector, you need to have a PAIA Manual in place (this may change from time to time):
Picture
The due date for PAIA and POPI is 1 July 2021, and it is immensely important that your company complies within the given due date to prevent any fines or penalties by the regulator.

Please contact us if you require any assistance with your PAIA Manual, we will gladly assist you. You can also go to our website for more information on how to contact us.
1 Comment

POPI Information Officer registration

5/24/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture

Businesses can now register their Information Officers online with the Information Regulator. Businesses must do so without delay to avoid any penalties or regulatory action. The Information Officer is usually the CEO or COO of the company and may delegate some functions to Deputy Information Officers, who must also be registered.

Please ensure that information officers are duly appointed and that the necessary information is submitted.

The online portal of the Information Regulator can be viewed here.
One can also contact the Information regulator on their email address: registration.IR@justice.gov.za .

For more information on registration and responsibilities please see the Guidance Note issued recently on 1 April.

If you need any assistance with rolling out your policies please contact us or see our starter kit on our online store!
0 Comments

No extension on POPI due 1 July 2021

3/23/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture
The Information Regulator recently announced that there will be no extension given to the current POPI grace period, which means that the due date will remain unchanged and all organisations in South Africa should comply with the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) by the 1st of July 2021. The same due date counts for complying with the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA).

Advocate Pansy Tlakula, chairperson of the Information Regulator also added to the above announcement that severe penalties will be given to business’s not complying with POPIA within the given timeframe (whether it is intentional or accidental). Penalties can include fines up to R10 million and a jail sentence of up to 10 years. It is therefore extremely important that ALL businesses implement the required POPI policies and procedures as soon as possible.
​
The POPIA is introduced to ensure business’s conduct themselves in a responsible manner when collecting, processing, storing, and sharing another entity’s personal information, by holding them accountable should they abuse or compromise personal information in any way.

The regulator can grant exemptions for certain circumstances and relevant functions within business’s if it is satisfied that the public interest outweighs the interference with the privacy of the data subject.
1 Comment

POPI & PAIA - who, what and when?

2/4/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
In this post we take a short look at what POPI and PAIA entails, who it applies to and when you need to do what. Obviously, this is a oversimplified summary created for short attentions spans. The work itself is much more in depth. Contact us if you do not have it in place yet and we can assist you with your POPI needs.
POPI
Many of you might vaguely recall the term POPI (Protection of Personal Information Act) but do not really know what to do with it and by when. The new regulations that come into full effect on 1 July 2021 mean every business in South Africa need to comply with them. This is in line with global trends to better guard personal information of clients, as can be seen in the EU with GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation).

What is it?
It deals with the management of client data and everything related thereto. In short, one would need the following to comply:
  • a POPI policy that is developed, monitored and maintained
  • appoint an Information Officer
  • Perform an impact assessment/GAP analysis on the business relating to POPI
  • Training and awareness is conducted on POPI
PAIA
POPI should also be read with PAIA (Promotion of Access to Information Act). This Act only applies to certain companies with 50 or more employees and in certain sectors. Read more about whether you need to comply here or contact us for advice. The deadline for compliance on PAIA was extended to 30June 2021.

What is it?


PAIA is focused on providing the public with access to records of companies in a structured manner. Generally speaking if a company needs to comply with this law it needs to have
  • a PAIA Policy
  • appoint an Information Officer
  • Submit the Policy to the SAHRC
As always, contact us if you need help putting this in place.
0 Comments

FAIS to be replaced by COFI - 2nd bill tabled

10/21/2020

2 Comments

 
Picture
National Treasury issued the second draft of the new COFI (Conduct of Financial Institutions) Bill on 29 September 2020. For those of you that do not know, the COFI Act will will replace the FAIS Act in totality and be the focus for your compliance in coming years. In addition, the COFI Act will regulate the conduct of other services and product providers. The bill also wants to ensure a level playing field. We need to keep the regulator accountable and we need to ensure the regulation makes sense whilst preventing the situation where "all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others", as the book of Animal Farm in the picture above warns.

The latest changes in the second draft are:
  • The application of the COFI Bill in relation to existing legislation.
  • The approach to conduct standards
  • Refined licensing approach
  • More detail around transformation (BEE and EE) and enforcement thereof
  • Medical schemes are removed until more work is done
  • Streamlining of interaction between the Financial Markets Act and the COFI Act
  • Application to the non-retail business where clients are corporates or where clients are professional investors, for example

We are responding and commenting as a compliance firm to the draft. If you are a member of an industry representative body (like the FIA or FPI) you can also provide your comments through them. If you are not a member of an industry representative body then you can send your comments directly to National Treasury or to us to add it to our comments and to send on your behalf.
this piece of legislation will control your business in the future and determine the shape and form of your industry for years to come.
​I, for one, am concerned at the new practise we see at the FSCA where they seem to ask extra and unlimited amounts of questions to new licensees without informing the applicant if these new requirements beforehand which leads to copious delays. In addition to that, I am concerned at how difficult it is with the FAIS Act in its current form to become a Key Individual or to start your own FSP. We will be taking up these and other concerns in our comments to the FSCA.

We encourage everyone to comment in whatever form because this piece of legislation will control your business in the future and determine the shape and form of your industry for years to come. Any risks, detriment to you or unnecessary red tape that is not addressed will become part of your life and we'd like to avoid that as much as possible.

The due date is 30 October 2020 but we've heard from some sources that they are still receiving comments after that as extensions were provided to certain industry representative bodies until 16 November 2020. Comments submitted directly to National Treasury can be sent to: marketconduct@treasury.gov.za .

You can view the full published bill and other documents here.
2 Comments

Pre-populated ROA's

8/31/2020

2 Comments

 
Picture
​You may be aware of third parties that offer the service of comparing product details when replacements are made on financial products. These comparisons are often relied on by advisors without ensuring all details contained therein are an accurate reflection of the financial product and all its unique and most updated features. 

When the advisor relies on the comparison without ensuring 100% correctness, incorrect advice may be given and the client may make a decision based on the incorrect advice. Consequently, when disputes arise, the advisor wants to hold the third party responsible for providing incorrect information. 

The FSCA is concerned about this practise and recommends that advisors check the factual correctness of all compared product features, before giving advice to the client. It is the responsibility of the advisor to ensure correctness, therefore, if a dispute arises, the advisor could be held responsible.

The same is true for pre-populated ROA's without replacements. We often see that advisors have a general statement that may or may not be tweaked to fit a client's circumstances, that paragraphs are copied between different clients' ROA's, or that one paragraph is copied and pasted over-and-over on the same ROA. This practise is a recipe for negligence and consequently, disputes. We urge all advisors to provide unique descriptions of a client's needs and reasons for preferences/choices, to ensure an accurate audit trail is kept and thus minimising opportunities for disputes. 

The FSCA communication on this subject can be accessed by clicking on the "FSCA Post" button below:

FSCA Post
2 Comments

New FAIS changes - FAIS Code of Conduct

7/9/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Summary 
Recent changes (June - July 2020) were made to the General Code of Conduct, Fit and Proper Requirements and Short Term Deposit Codes of Conduct to give effect to the RDR (retail distribution review), among other process that commenced long ago. Most of the changes that will affect an FSP are those contained in the General Code of Conduct. It is to be noted that most of the legislative changes that have an effect on FSP's come into effect only 6 months after publication.
We summarise the changes here shortly and will further disseminate and assist our clients in the coming months to implement this.
Fit and Proper Changes
The bulk of the changes under Fit and Proper are administrative in nature such as aligning definitions across product legislation and FAIS legislation and correcting numbering so there is not too much that will affect you here. Notable changes to the regulations here are:​
  • an FSP may not appoint an unrehabilitated insolvent
  • if a representative is sequestrated after appointment the FSP can only keep the representative if risk mitigating measures are put in place
  • operational ability requirements of the FSP is expanded where data and physical security of client information is concerned
  • where FSP applicants are concerned, expenditure considered less certain items one would normally include such as bonuses, bad debts etc.
  • Professional Bodies can only accredit CPD activities that are verifiable
Changes to the General Code of Conduct
Here are many changes that will impact the operation of an FSP in general. Close attention is to be paid here. Notable changes are:
  • General
    • Direct marketing is now seen as rendering services via telephone, internet, digital platform or email
    • One is not allowed to use regulators logo or name
    • Not use FAIS approval to support business or products that is not regulated
    • New definition of a direct marketer
    • Immaterial financial interest now includes loyalty rewards
  • Independence & Fees
    • Not allowed to say they are independent if certain condictions are prevalent
    • One is only allowed the fees that are agreed to with the client and commensurate to the services rendered
    • Methods on recommendation of products and conflict of interest and fair treatment of clients are further prescribed
  • FNA 
    • New definition of FNA
    • One must take into consideration the level of knowledge of client
    • Allowance for focused or limited FNA is further expanded
    • Replacement advice further expanded
    • Cancellation of products is further expanded
    • Comparison of products not allowed if features are not compared and disclosed clearly
  • Advertisements
    • Need to have process/policy for advertisements
    • Negative option marketing is not allowed
    • Clients must be allowed to opt out of unwanted direct marketing
    • Comparative Marketing is further regulated
    • Testimonials is further regulated
    • Loyalty Benefits is further regulated
    • Forecasts is further regulated
    • Puffery (advertising overstatements) is further regulated
  • Complaints Management
    • Framework is expanded
    • Responsibilities is expanded
    • Complaints categorisation is expanded
    • Escalation and review, decisions and communication is expanded
    • Record keeping and anlalysis is expanded
  • Ombud Interactions
    • Must have processes to communicate and state ombud details
    • Monitor cases and improve internal processes​
Changes to the Short Term Deposit Code of Conduct
​​These changes mainly apply to banks and are of an administrative nature where definitions are aligned to the new changes in the General Code of conduct. Not much to see here.
Please the full set of notices here if you are feeling particularly sadistic and want to read the legislation yourself.
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    by: Horizon Compliance team

    Compliance Experts

    Archives

    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017

    Categories

    All
    AML
    CBR
    Code Of Conduct
    COFI
    Coronavirus
    COVID 19
    COVID-19
    Crypto
    FAIS
    FICA
    Financial
    Fintech
    FSB
    FSCA
    FSTC
    PAIA
    POPI
    Property Syndication
    Regtech
    Regulators
    THRESHOLDS
    Training

    RSS Feed

Picture
Copyright © Horizon Compliance (Pty) Ltd 2014-2021

See our Privacy Statement here and our PAIA Manual Policy here. The material and information contained on this website is for general information purposes only. You should not rely upon the material or information on the website as a basis for making any business, legal or any other decisions. Whilst we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, Horizon makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such material is therefore strictly at your own risk. Horizon will not be liable for any false, inaccurate, inappropriate or incomplete information presented on the website.

  • Home
  • About
  • Training
  • Store
  • Client Portal
  • Blog
  • Contact