Horizon Compliance
  • Home
  • About
  • Training
  • Store
  • Client Portal
  • Blog
  • Contact

Compliance 

and other interesting stuff

the new fica amendments

11/3/2017

0 Comments

 
The new amendments of FICA changes the compliance framework for accountable institutions to a great extent and we'll discuss some of the more pertinent items in this blog post.

Risk Based Compliance

According to the new requirements of FICA, accountable institutions now need to take a risk based approach to FICA and the implementation thereof. This includes:
 
  • The nature, scale and complexity of the accountable institution’s business; 
  • The diversity of its operations, including geographical diversity; 
  • Its client, product or services profile; 
  • Its distribution channels; 
  • The volume and size of its transactions; and 
  • The degree of risk associated with each area of its operation. 
 
One must also now be able to risk rate clients according to the risk that they pose with regards to being used for money laundering or to channel the proceeds of any crime. Certain customers and businesses are a lower risk than others and some are a higher risk. Some of the aspects that one can look at to determine the risk a client poses are:
 
  • Does the client operate in a sector or industry that is subject to specific standards, market entry or market conduct requirements, other regulatory requirements (especially AML/CFT measures)? 
  • Has the client been in a business relationship with the institution for a period of time? 
  • What has been the patterns of transaction behaviour (e.g. speed, frequency, size, volume, etc.) of a client who has a history of a business relationship with an institution? 
  • Has the institution previously observed suspicious or unusual activities or transactions on the part of the client? 
  • If the client is a corporate vehicle, is it part of a complex or multi layered structure of ownership or control? 
  • What information does the client provide concerning their source(s) of income? 
  • What is the nature of the client’s business activity, e.g. does the activity involve transacting in large amounts of cash, cross-border movements of funds, trading in sensitive, controlled or sanctioned commodities, etc? 
  • What is the nature of the type of the products and services offered by the client? 
  • Does the client operate solely within the country or do they have cross-border operations? 
  • Is the client’s product selection rational with a view to support their business or personal needs? 
  • Does the client occupy a prominent public position or perform a public function at a senior level or does it have such individuals within its ownership and control structure? 
  • Is there adverse information about the client available from public or commercial sources? 
  • Is the client known to be subject to financial sanctions? 
 

Enchanced Due Diligence
​

When and if you see that a customer is a medium to higher risk we always advise in taking extra measures with software such as:
PEP (Politically Exposed Person) checks 
Sanctions checks
Adverse news checks (i.e. that shows allegations or actual proven criminal activity)
Understanding the sources of funds better and the transaction aims
Asking any other questions that would comply with your risk based approach and set you mind at ease or that would prover your concerns with the client

Contact us for assistance

We can assist you with any policy drafting requirements, risk measurements, training and software checks for PEPs, Sanctions and Adverse news screening. Contact us today for assistance to ensure your business is safe!
0 Comments

WHO NEEDS TO REGISTER with the FIC?

9/26/2017

3 Comments

 
Schedule 1 and 3 to the Financial Intelligence Centre Act lists who should register with the FIC as Accountable and Reporting Institutions respectively. A failure to register with the FIC carries maximum penalties of up to R10m (R50m for entities) and 5 years in prison. Yikes!

It is also quite important to note that each branch of a business must register with the FIC separately, not just the head office.

The difference between Accountable and Reporting institutions are that Reporting Institutions merely report certain transactions on a continual basis, whereas Accountable institutions need to have policies and procedures to identify clients, to risk rate them according to a risk management control program and ultimately report certain transactions to the FIC such as Cash Threshold Reports (CTR's) and Suspicious Transaction Reports (STR's), among other things.
​"It is also quite important to note that each branch of a business must register with the FIC separately, not just the head office.
At the time this is published the list of Accountable and Reporting institutions are as follows:

Accountable Institutions

  1. A practitioner who practices as defined in section 1 of the Attorneys Act, 1979 (Act No. 53 of 1979).
  2. A board of executors or a trust company or any other person that invests, keeps in safe custody, controls or administers trust property within the meaning of the Trust Property Control Act, 1988 (Act No. 57 of 1988).
  3. An estate agent as defined in the Estate Agency Affairs Act, 1976 (Act No. 112 of 1976).
  4. An authorised user of an exchange as defined in the Securities Service Act, 2004 (Act No. 36 of 2004).
  5. A manager registered in terms of the Collective Schemes Control Act, 2002 (Act 45 of 2002), but excludes managers who only conduct business in Part VI of the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act (Act 45 of 2002).
  6. A person who carries on the "business of a bank" as defined in the Banks Act, 1990 (Act No. 94 of 1990). A mutual bank as defined in the Mutual Banks Act, 1993 (Act No. 124 of 1993).
  7. A person who carries on a "long-term insurance business" as defined in the Long-Term Insurance Act, 1998 (Act No. 52 of 1998).
  8. A person who carries on the business of making available a gambling activity as contemplated in section 3 of the National Gambling Act, 2004 (Act7 of 2004) in respect of which a license is required to be issued by the National Gambling Board or a provincial licensing authority.
  9. A person who carries on the business of dealing in foreign exchange.
  10. A person who carries on the business of lending money against the security of securities.
  11. A person who carries on the business of a financial services provider requiring authorisation in terms of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, 2002 (Act 37 of 2002), to provide advice and intermediary services in respect of the investment of any financial product (but excluding a short term insurance contract or policy referred to in the Short-term Insurance Act, 1998 (53 of 1998) and a health service benefit provided by a medical scheme as defined in section 1 (1) of the Medical Schemes Act, 1998 (Act 131 of 1998.)
  12. A person who issues, sells or redeems travellers' cheques, money orders or similar instruments. The Postbank referred to in section 51 of the Postal Services Act, 1998 (Act No. 124 of 1998). 
  13. The Ithala Development Finance Corporation Limited. 
  14. A person who carries on the business of a money remitter.

Reporting Institutions

  1. A person who carries on the business of dealing in motor vehicles.
  2. A person who carries on the business of dealing in Kruger rands.
Now it is also interesting to note that these lists are under review by the FIC and they will likely be expanded to include other service and product companies such as credit providers and auctioneers.

If you or your company needs any advice or services that with regards to FICA and Anti-Money Laundering please give us a call!
3 Comments

FICA & Training

7/31/2017

3 Comments

 
Accountable institutions such as lawyers, financial services providers and estate agents (among others) are required by the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 (FICA) to provide training to staff on FICA in terms of section 43. The training must enable staff to comply with FICA and the internal rules of the company itself and it is not a requirement that this particular training puts them to sleep (although some compliance training providers can readily be regarded as sleep training experts).

A recent "Public Compliance Communication No. 18" by the FIC stated that the training must educate the employees on a range of different factors. Different training levels can be implemented at different levels of the organisation. We believe one can have a General Awareness for all staff in the company and then a more in-depth Specific Awareness training course. However, as always, it depends on the organisation to conduct training commensurate to the risks it is facing.

"The training can take place in any manner that the company deems fit. I.e. online or in person."

The training can take place in any manner that the company deems fit. I.e. online or in person. Tests must also be done to assess the knowledge gained and record must be kept of the training given and attendance. The FIC stated that the training must be "ongoing" and "refresher" training must be conducted. We believe that a good rule of thumb is to do any AML/FICA/KYC training once a year and as soon as any new joiners start with a company.

Any non-compliance with the Act in relation to the above-mentioned can result in a fine of R10 million and 5 years in prison.

So, if you don't want to be a jailbird, ensure your training procedures are in place or give us a shout to provide you with training at: hello@horizoncompliance.co.za.
3 Comments

    by: Horizon Compliance team

    Compliance Experts

    Archives

    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017

    Categories

    All
    AML
    Code Of Conduct
    COFI
    Coronavirus
    COVID 19
    COVID-19
    Crypto
    FAIS
    FICA
    Financial
    Fintech
    FSB
    FSCA
    FSTC
    PAIA
    POPI
    Property Syndication
    Regtech
    Regulators
    THRESHOLDS
    Training

    RSS Feed

Picture
Copyright © Horizon Compliance (Pty) Ltd 2014-2021

See our Privacy Statement here and our PAIA Manual Policy here. The material and information contained on this website is for general information purposes only. You should not rely upon the material or information on the website as a basis for making any business, legal or any other decisions. Whilst we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, Horizon makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such material is therefore strictly at your own risk. Horizon will not be liable for any false, inaccurate, inappropriate or incomplete information presented on the website.

  • Home
  • About
  • Training
  • Store
  • Client Portal
  • Blog
  • Contact